Hi, what are you looking for?
A Consortium Led By IBL Group To Purchase Majority Stake In Equator Energy
Data Center Firm Teraco Plans To Build 200 MW Of Solar PV To Power Its Facilities In South Africa
Steel Is A Major Climate Problem, But Can Decarbonize Rapidly In The Coming Decades
The New Normal in Energy Systems
US Solar Energy Through The Ages — Deploying & Evangelizing Solar
Universities Develop Ways for Wind Turbines to Generate More Energy
Steel Is A Major Climate Problem, But Can Decarbonize Rapidly In The Coming Decades
The New Normal in Energy Systems
Tata Power Secures 510 Megawatt Solar-Wind Hybrid PPA
Over 1 GW Of Private Solar & Wind Projects Registered In South Africa In The First 2 Months Of 2023
Adding Up The Benefits Of Geothermal
Comparing The Net Value of Geothermal, Wind, Solar, & Solar+Storage In The Western United States
Full Steam Ahead: Unearthing The Power of Geothermal
Fervo Energy Plans Direct Air Capture Facility Powered By Geothermal Heat & Electricity
2023 Global Energy Trends: Crisis, Contingencies, & Climate Change (Video Included!)
South African Battery Storage Firm Solar MD Sees Record Growth In South Africa Last Year
The New Normal in Energy Systems
Australian Battery Technology Firm Relectrify Achieves World-First Certification For Cell-Level Control In Commercial Battery Product
CleanTechnica Tested: The Jackery Solar Generator 3000 Pro
Getting More Lithium, Sustainably — Summit Nanotech
Nottingham City Council’s Eastcroft Depot Launches New Vehicle-To-Grid (V2G) Demonstrator Project
PG&E Will Test Tesla & Sonnen Virtual Power Plant Technology
Sonnen & TenneT Power German Grid With Electric Cars
1st Virtual Power Plant from SolarEdge Supporting UK Grid
Google, Ford, GM, & Solar Companies Partner To Promote Scaling Of Virtual Power Plants
Help Me Get More “Boots On The Ground” CleanTech Coverage
With Heat From Heat Pumps, US Energy Requirements Could Plummet By 50%
Heat Pumps For Every Home
BlocPower Brings Energy Efficiency To Low & Moderate Income Families
Study: Heat Pumps 2–3× Cheaper Than Green Hydrogen In Europe
Some Ford Dealers Withdraw From Electric Car Sales Program
Lexus (Mostly) Fixes The Yoke With Steer-By-Wire
The Battle for Germany’s EV Market, Part II — Tesla Model 3 Called for Duty
BYD Launches Dolphin In Thailand At Price Parity With Popular ICE Vehicles!
The One Where Jo Says Every Car Dealer Needs Splitvolt
Help Me Get More “Boots On The Ground” CleanTech Coverage
CleanTechnica Tested: The Jackery Solar Generator 3000 Pro
Utah Record Snowfall — More Adventures in Winter Driving with My Dual Motor Tesla Model 3 (+ FSD Beta Update)
90,000 Miles On My Tesla Model 3 — Maintenance Costs Higher Than Expected
The Battle for Germany’s EV Market, Part II — Tesla Model 3 Called for Duty
37% Of New Cars Sold In Netherlands Now Plugin Cars
Tesla Is #2 Best Selling Auto Brand In California
The Global ICE Industry Cliff Is Here
Tesla + BYD Nearly 40% Of BEV Sales Globally
Help Me Get More “Boots On The Ground” CleanTech Coverage
CleanTechnica Tested: The Jackery Solar Generator 3000 Pro
Utah Record Snowfall — More Adventures in Winter Driving with My Dual Motor Tesla Model 3 (+ FSD Beta Update)
90,000 Miles On My Tesla Model 3 — Maintenance Costs Higher Than Expected
2023 Chevrolet Bolt EUV Premier Redline Edition — Video Review
Sandy Munro: The Coming Wave of Chinese EVs
Sandy Munro On Which Automakers Are Getting It Right Besides Tesla
Sandy Munro: How Tesla Gets To The $25,000 Car
Sandy Munro: Tesla Is “Engineering At The Speed Of Thought”
Farmers don’t buy spraying drones or hire drone spraying services because of the environmental benefits, of course. They don’t need to justify the use of them. They sign on the dotted line for higher profits.
Not long ago I had the opportunity to spend 90 minutes with Arthur Erickson of Hylio, a North American manufacturer of agricultural spraying drones (and a sensor drone coming soon). The two episodes of the podcast that resulted tell a fascinating story of agricultural technical transformation.
In the first episode, Erickson lays out the basics. Two of Hylio’s biggest drones, the AG-272 with its 14-foot tip-to-tip diameter can carry 400 pounds of agricultural inputs — fertilizer, herbicides, pesticides and fungicides — between them, and can cover as much acreage in a day as a $700,000 modern spraying tractor, yet all-in cost about $200,000. Even a second-hand tractor which covers less ground per hour will cost likely $300,000.
And modern tractors take well over a year to deliver after ordering, can have upwards of twenty miles of cabling, and require sophisticated computer-analysis and wrenching when things go wrong. When something goes wrong, they can be out of service for weeks. Despite massive demand, Hylio’s drones have a few months for delivery times, and are incredibly mechanically simple, so very easy for farmers to wrench in the fields.
Agricultural drones are pervasive, as I discovered after the discussion. Erickson’s guess was 15% usage by the two million farms in the US, either as a service or with direct ownership, but statistics suggest current usage is a lot closer to 100% than not, with 75% of farmers surveyed in 2018 having used or planning to use drones.
Most of that usage is in surveying drones, and usually fixed wing drones. With sensor packages that include high-resolution cameras and multispectral sensors that can spot temperature gradients and degrees of moisture, and SaaS platforms like Pix4d that stitch together data from any sensor set to provide input insights and KML files for precision agriculture, farmers know exactly where to put how much product.
But it’s tough to get precision without drones. Aerial crop sprayers that use fixed wing or rotorcraft vehicles spray a lot of inputs very quickly, but lots of it gets blown off the fields and over nearby roads, ditches, ponds, and the wrong fields. And they have to pull up short or come in late when wires cross the ends of fields or poles are sticking up. As a result, a great deal of inputs don’t do what they are supposed to do, nourish crops or kill insects or fungus.
Running tractors across taller crops crushes a lot of them, and it can be tough to get into corners and around obstacles to get good coverage. And you often can’t run tractors in wet fields when fungus is blooming because they’ll get stuck or rip up the ground too much.
Agricultural spraying drones, on the other hand, put 400 pounds of down pressure on inputs as they fly 15 feet above crops, aerosolizing inputs and pushing them in among the plants and to the ground, providing much better coverage. And obviously they don’t care about muddy fields at all, allowing early fungicidal application with lower volumes and greater efficacy. Per Erickson, an upcoming peer-reviewed report will likely show 30% to 50% reduction in volumes of inputs to achieve the same agricultural harvests, a massive saving.
And tractor usage is a problem with more than crushed crops and ripped up fields. Soil compaction is a major problem. Erickson suggested 3% to 10% benefits from avoiding soil compaction, but studies show 9% to 55% crop reductions from it. Obviously drones buzzing lightly through the air don’t compact the soil at all.
I did a bunch of research post our discussion and documented much of this in greater detail in an article Agricultural Drones Are Disrupting Crop Spraying, Crop Analytics, & The Tractor Biz a month ago, so read that to find out more.
Of course, the drone that weighs perhaps 150 pounds that is carrying 200 pounds of inputs is also sipping at electricity while the multiton tractors and aerial sprayers are pounding back the diesel and avgas. The costs of operation are vastly lower, and the benefits of using decarbonizing electricity to power spraying instead of fossil fuels is a big advantage.
But the advantages are much bigger than just saving direct CO2 emissions, the subject of much of the second half of the discussion.
That 30% to 50% reduction in inputs and much lower inputs being wasted in adjacent areas and water ways is big. While the major annual post-harvest fertilization is done with tractors as it often involves hundreds of pounds of fertilizer per acre, the subsequent 4-5 passes being vastly more efficient means that especially ammonia-based fertilizers are reduced. That has two benefits. The first is that ammonia is currently made with natural gas or coal derived hydrogen, with CO2e emissions of 8 to 35 times the mass of the hydrogen, resulting in best case around 8 times the mass of ammonia. That’s a big climate problem.
But ammonia-based fertilizers applied to fields split out the hydrogen and nitrogen in the ammonia in a chemical reaction, leaving most of the nitrogen fertilizing the crops, but turning a bunch of the rest of it into nitrous oxide with a global warming potential 265 times that of CO2. And nitrous oxide, unlike methane, persists in the atmosphere for a long time. That turns the 8 pounds of CO2e per pound of fertilizer into more like 11 pounds.
30% to 50% reductions in passes across the field with ammonia-based fertilizers has a big climate benefit, as that vector is one of the biggest agricultural inputs to climate change.
But phosphates, another key input, have issues as well. When they run off of fields or simply land in waterways due to over spraying, they accumulate downstream in ponds and lakes, and can cause algal blooms that suck the oxygen from the water, kill aquatic life, and leave stinking masses of rotting algae in recreational and residential water bodies.
Farmers don’t buy spraying drones or hire drone spraying services because of the environmental benefits, of course. They don’t need to justify the use of them. They sign on the dotted line for more crops, lower costs of operation, and lower costs of inputs, all things which maximize their bottom line. Hylio doesn’t bother to tout the environmental benefits, and Erickson is quick to downplay any suggestion that his ag drones are carbon neutral or environmentally inert, although his concerns about battery production are somewhat overstated in my opinion.
For people interested in more details on this thread of our conversation, I published a greater analysis in another article Agriculture Is A Massive Climate Problem, & Ag Drones Are A Key Wedge at about the same time.
The conversation was great, and it was good comparing and contrasting with other drone-oriented firms like Grant Canary’s DroneSeed and Kaitlyn Albertoli and Vikhyat Chaudhry’s Buzz Solutions, both of which I’d spent time talking to in the past couple of years as I looked at the disruptive use of drone-based solutions to accelerate climate remediation and improve grid resilience. Erickson considers DroneSeed to be the grandfather in the space, having paved the way for heavy lift drones flying large payloads autonomously over rural areas.
is a member of the Advisory Boards of electric aviation startup FLIMAX, Chief Strategist at TFIE Strategy and co-founder of distnc technologies. He spends his time projecting scenarios for decarbonization 40-80 years into the future, and assisting executives, Boards and investors to pick wisely today. Whether it's refueling aviation, grid storage, vehicle-to-grid, or hydrogen demand, his work is based on fundamentals of physics, economics and human nature, and informed by the decarbonization requirements and innovations of multiple domains. His leadership positions in North America, Asia and Latin America enhanced his global point of view. He publishes regularly in multiple outlets on innovation, business, technology and policy. He is available for Board, strategy advisor and speaking engagements.
Advertise with CleanTechnica to get your company in front of millions of monthly readers.
Steel, like concrete, is such an integral part of our world that we rarely notice it. From wherever you are reading this, I guarantee...
We've already manufactured an awful lot of steel. There are hundreds of billions of tons of the stuff lying around, much of it obsolete.
Boston's pending green building code is an important element of many challenges that Wu will need to solve for Boston's Green New Deal to...
We've mined enormous amounts of iron and coal in order to build infrastructure to extract, process, refine, and distribute fossil fuels, and we're going...
Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.